If you are at the receiving end, it doesn’t matter if such weapons are ‘smart’ or stupid…
Are you a publisher? Try Daylife's Intelligent Content Services Platform
If you are at the receiving end, it doesn’t matter if such weapons are ‘smart’ or stupid…
Let’s not forget the conventional weapons, which have been perfected over the years to inflict maximum collateral damage
Forty years ago, Dr. Clarke said that the only defence against the weapons of the future is to prevent them from being used.... Perhaps we could add to that, we should prevent them from being built. It’s time that we all heed his warning....I just hope people in other world capitals also are listening...
I can still remember Vikram telling me how Indian politicians pleaded with him to ‘build a teeny weeny (nuclear) bomb’
The only defence against the weapons of the future is to prevent them ever being used. In other words, the problem is political and not military at all. A country’s armed forces can no longer defend it; the most they can promise is the destruction of the attacker....
High tech weapons are the crutches of impotent nations; nukes are just the decorative chromium plating.
The moment I heard this, I wrote to Taylor, saying ‘Don’t you know smoking is bad for your health?’
It is a cultural practice here that we don't speak ill of the dead
Even in death, the sage of science fiction could not shake off the accusations of pedophilia leveled against him
disturbed to discover that there has been a long-standing conspiracy here in Sri Lanka to discredit him ... involving activists associated with child welfare organizations.