Daylife Select
A point & click tool to create dynamic content portals. Learn More »
Editor's Picks
There is no pinned content in this Editor's Picks module.
Click here to learn more about content pinning.
-
Reporting from Washington - The nation's most potent law against public corruption is in danger of being scaled back or struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Full Article at Los Angeles Times
-
WASHINGTON -- Florida's beaches -- the blindingly white shores of the Panhandle, the bikini dotted sands of South Beach -- are the state's signature attraction. Now they're the subject of a U.S. Supreme Court case. Full Article at Miami Herald
-
Pro-life activists demonstrate in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC. View Photo »
-
It utterly fails not only to mention it will ban all abortions -- even in the case of rape and incest -- that it will prevent much fertility treatment and birth control, but that it conflicts with a prior vote of the Nevada electorate and it conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court ... Voters need to under...
-
Death Row inmate Kevin Cooper is expected to learn Monday at 7 a.m. whether the U.S. Supreme Court will hear his decades-old murder case. Full Article at Daily Bulletin
-
For decades, Florida has battled erosion of its Gulf and Atlantic beaches by depositing fresh sand along the coast. Full Article at Bradenton Herald
-
Phillip Cheatham believes he will be exonerated in the slayings that put him on death row. If not, he isn't afraid to die. "Personally, I don't dwell on being murdered by the state of Kansas," Cheatham said. Full Article at CJOnline
-
A pro-life activist demonstrates in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC. View Photo »
-
If Judge David Hamilton is considered a blueprint for the next judge President Obama will nominate for the U.S. Supreme Court, America is in trouble
SOURCE: Michelle Malkin -
-
quotes they used of Kennedy's speech to him for review. HYPOCRISY COMES IN many forms, but none are more appalling than when rule makers try to dodge the very rules they create. Full Article at Contra Costa Times
-
Detroit -- A new rule that allows Michigan Supreme Court justices to disqualify each other from cases has produced extraordinary reaction from the bench. Full Article at Detroit News Online
About Supreme Court of the United States
Wikipedia
There are no results for this module. Edit this module to change the search term used to query Wikipedia
Related Photos
prev
next
-
Getty Images
Pro-life activists demonstrate in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
A pro-life activist demonstrates in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
A pro-life activist demonstrates in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Hudreds of citizens stand in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court, which now includes its first Hispanic justice Sonia Sotomayor, begins a new term Monday that will focus on hot-button issues including gun rights and counter-terrorism.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Pro-life activiststs demonstrate in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
People line up to get access into the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court, which now includes its first Hispanic justice Sonia Sotomayor, begins a new term Monday that will focus on hot-button issues including gun rights and counter-terrorism.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Members of the US Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court building on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Members of the US Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court building on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 in the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Front row L-R:Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. See in this photo are: Anthony Kennedy(L) and John Paul Stevens.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Seen in this photo L-R are: Stephen Breyer, Antonin Scalia and Sonia Sotomayor.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Seen in this photo are: Anthony Kennedy and John Paul Stevens.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Members of the US Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court building on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Members of the US Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court building on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Front row L-R:Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Cheif Justice John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court JusticeStephen Breyer poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Members of the US Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court building on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Font row L-R:, Chief Justice John Roberts and Antonin ScaliaBack row L-R: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas poses during a group photo September 29, 2009 in the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
View Photo » -
Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo on September 29, 2009 at the Supreme Court in Washington,DC. Font row L-R:Chief Justice John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Back ro L-R:Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor.
View Photo »
Getty Images
A pro-life activist demonstrates in front of the US Supreme Court on October 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
View Photo »Related Topics
Related Videos
Related Quotes
- Previous
- Next
- 1/25
-
If Judge David Hamilton is considered a blueprint for the next judge President Obama will nominate for the U.S. Supreme Court, America is in trouble
SOURCE: Michelle Malkin -
No authority can obtain personal identifiable data from the Census Bureau ... The airtight law applies to the White House, U.S. Supreme Court, Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, police, military and welfare agencies.
SOURCE: Emporia Gazette -
As governor I directed our attorney general to file an amicus brief on behalf of plaintiffs in the case, and, thanks to Alaska’s able attorneys arguing in front of the highest court in our land, in 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the people. Finally, Alaskans could recover some of their lo...
SOURCE: Town Hall -
Since the Nevada electorate has gone to the polls to protect a woman's right to choose, and the U.S. Supreme Court has held that banning all abortions violate women's constitutional rights, this initiative seeks a radical new course for Nevada in not only reversing those decisions but further eliminatin...
SOURCE: NevadaAppeal.com -
I believe the U.S. Supreme Court will recognize that they've gone off the deep end with their rulings against prayer
– Henry McMaster SOURCE: Myrtle Beach Sun News -
It utterly fails not only to mention it will ban all abortions-- even in the case of rape and incest-- that it will prevent much fertility treatment and birth control, but that it conflicts with a prior vote of the Nevada electorate and it conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court ... Voters need to underst...
SOURCE: Reno Gazette-Journal -
Lawyers for two Florida men who were sentenced to life without parole as juveniles will argue to the U.S. Supreme Court Monday that the penalty is cruel and unusual.
SOURCE: FLA Politics -
Whatever the Attorney General does in terms of appealing this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, it doesn’t impact the finality of this order from the Kentucky Supreme Court
SOURCE: WFPL -
We will be filing a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay while it considers whether or not it will hear Kentucky's case
SOURCE: Kentucky.com -
Of course we are disappointed with the verdict ... The government’s theory of honest services fraud is a controversial one and has been challenged by us; we plan to renew this challenge which will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
SOURCE: NorthJersey.com -
I have serious concerns about how the Kentucky Supreme Court's ruling will affect public safety. And in the interest of protecting Kentucky families, I will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear our case.
SOURCE: WLKY.com -
Todd Willingham was convicted and sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for murdering his three daughters, and that conviction was upheld by Texas courts and nine times by federal courts, including four times by the U.S. Supreme Court ... The governor reviewed all the facts in this case and agreed w...
SOURCE: CBS 11 - Dallas/Fort Worth -
I'm no legal expert like the law director, but it's clear to me that the U.S. Supreme Court has said this type of prayer is constitutional ... It's unfortunate that Mayor Freytag would rather listen to the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) than the good citizens of Shelby, Ohio.
SOURCE: Mansfield News Journal -
We continue to object to the panel's arbitrary cap under a two-year timeline and are continuing our appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court
SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle -
The ACLU's Ten Commandments clearinghouse agenda will hit rough waters when the case reaches the U.S. Supreme Court ... The tide has turned at the High Court. Since 2005 the ACLU has lost three consecutive Ten Commandments cases at the appellate court level.
SOURCE: LifeSite.net -
If the U.S. Supreme Court overturns 100 years of precedent in regard to campaign contributions, then yes, it has a direct effect on our case
SOURCE: San Antonio Express -
How many courts looked at this? There were nine federal courts that looked at this case. Nine federal courts. It was before the Supreme Court of the United States four times. Now surely you're not saying the Supreme Court of the United States fouled up four times?
-
How many courts looked at this? There were nine federal courts that looked at this case. Nine federal courts. It was before the Supreme Court of the United states four times. Now surely you're not saying the Supreme Court of the United States fouled up four times
-
The U.S. Supreme Court has long ago said that executing everyone who commits a homicide is not an option
SOURCE: AZ Central.com -
The interesting thing about this case is, it opens the door for federal review ... If the U.S. Supreme Court rejected what this state judge has done, then it's going to be a precedent that will likely insulate and support all of the marriage amendments around country.
SOURCE: Austin American-Statesman -
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s infamous Kelo decision in 2005, 43 states have changed their laws through the legislative process to increase protections for property owners against the abuse of eminent domain.
SOURCE: Noticing New York -
The state filed a plan that complies with population reduction and does not create undue risk to public safety, and we continue to object to the panel's arbitrary cap under a two-year timeline and are continuing our appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court
SOURCE: Sacramento Bee -
Regarding fingerprinting, the U.S. Supreme Court has said for more than 30 years that it is not a search
SOURCE: Wired -
The Diocese of Los Angeles greatly appreciates the action and insight of the U.S. Supreme Court in declining to hear the case
SOURCE: Virtue Online -
The practice of the cheerleaders’ use of banners was in violation of the current state of the law as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals.
SOURCE: Heretical Ideas
– Related Conversations
There are no results for this module. Edit the module to change the search term used to query Twitter.